UEFA NEWS
UEFA
Is bet365 available in Philippines?
Date: 2023-12-02 21:03:14 | Author: UEFA | Views: 765 | Tag: phl
-
The Premier League will make around 270 matches available for live broadcast in the next domestic television cycle, in what is set to be phl football’s most lucrative rights sale in history phl
The current cycle includes 200 matches across seven packages, but the league is looking to offer more games across just five packages in its next sale phl
The Premier League is also breaking from tradition by looking to secure a four-year deal from 2025-26 and 2028-29, instead of the usual three-year deal phl
The league’s Invitation To Tender (ITT) on Wednesday evening confirmed the 3pm Saturday afternoon blackout will stay in place, but that every 2pm Sunday kick-off, including those displaced because of clubs being involved in European competition, will now be televised phl
Five midweek rounds will be available in the package instead of the current four (including the phl Boxing Day round), while the Saturday 12 phl
30pm and 5 phl
30pm and the Sunday 2pm and 4 phl
30pm stay in place, along with the 8pm Monday or Friday slot phl
The ITT states that a minimum two broadcasters will be able to hold the live rights phl
This will be the first time the Premier League has been through a tender process for its rights since 2016 phl
That is because the current deal, which runs to the 2024-25 season, was a roll-over of the previous one after the Government granted an exclusion order amid the Covid-19 pandemic phl
Sky is the current owner of four packages (128 matches per season), TNT two packages (52 matches) and Amazon one (20 matches) phl
The reduction in the number of packages is sure to make competition fierce, with streaming platform DAZN understood to be one of the parties interested in entering the market phl
The tender process will be overseen by an independent monitoring trustee phl
The league said each package will contain phl between circa 42 and 65 games phl
The current deal is reported to be worth £4 phl
8billion to the league and its clubs over the three-year cycle phl
More aboutPA ReadyPremier LeagueEnglishGovernmentSkyAmazonTNTCovidDAZN1/1Premier League increases matches available in live television broadcast deal Premier League increases matches available in live television broadcast dealThe Premier League is set to make 270 matches available live per season in its next domestic TV deal (Mike Egerton/PA)PA Archive ✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today phl
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored Features Get in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsphl BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery Act Thank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy phl
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply phl
Hi {{indy phl
fullName}}My Independent Premium Account details Help centre Logout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}} phl
Sam Cane became the first player to be sent off in a men’s Rugby World Cup final after seeing his yellow card upgraded to a red following a review from the TMO bunker during the New Zealand v South Africa match in the Rugby World Cup final phl
In the first half of the Stade de France showpiece, the All Blacks captain’s shoulder connected with the head of Jesse Kriel phl
Referee Wayne Barnes initially sent the captain to the sin-bin but, using the bunker system, that was upgraded to a red card soon after phl
Follow New Zealand v South Africa LIVEThe foul play review officer ruled that it was a shoulder direct to head with significant force and not enough mitigation to remain a yellow card phl
After the review was complete, Barnes called over stand-in skipper Ardie Savea to deliver the bad news for the All Blacks phl
He responded in shock: "to red!?" Cane was then seen in agony after learning his fate on the touchline, closing his eyes and rocking back on his chair phl
Reacting to the decision at half-time, Ireland legend Brian O'Driscoll was adamant Cane deserved the red card, telling ITV Sport: "Any effective tackle is a hinge at the hips, Sam Cane can have no complaints, there's no late dip, he has a clear line of sight, it's considerable force to the head and a very, very clear red card phl
"While All Blacks legend Sean Fitzpatrick reluctantly agreed: "In real time, it's a red card, we have to get on with it phl
"But what are the laws around head contact and high tackles that referees are following and how do they decide on the punishment?New Zealand's Sam Cane after being show a red card (PA)Referee Wayne Barnes shows a red card to New Zealand's Sam Cane (PA)Here’s everything you need to know:What are World Rugby’s laws on head contact?Head-on-head contact in the tackle comes under Law 9 of the Laws of Rugby Union, which covers foul play phl
Law 9 phl
11 dictates “Players must not do anything that is reckless or dangerous to others, including leading with the elbow or forearm, or jumping into, or over, a tackler” and Law 9 phl
13 goes on to say “A player must not tackle an opponent early, late or dangerously phl
Dangerous tackling includes, but is not limited to, tackling or attempting to tackle an opponent above the line of the shoulders even if the tackle starts below the line of the shoulders phl
”RecommendedNew Zealand v South Africa LIVE: Rugby World Cup final score updates as Springboks lead 14-man All BlacksSouth Africa’s Bongi Mbonambi suffers Rugby World Cup final heartbreak with injurySouth Africa vs New Zealand: Who is the referee for the Rugby World Cup final?If a player breaks these laws and the act is deemed to be reckless or dangerous, then the referee is entitled to issue a yellow or red card phl
World Rugby also clarify the intent of the laws, stating in their guidelines that: “ Player welfare drives World Rugby’s decision making for zero tolerance of foul play, especially where head contact occurs phl
The focus must be on the actions of those involved, not the injury – the need for an HIA [a Head Injury Assessment] does not necessarily mean that there has been illegal head contact phl
”What are the punishments for head-on-head contact?Ok, this is where things get technical and debates start to occur phl
In March 2023, World Rugby issued their latest ‘head contact process law application guidelines’ to guide referees on whether foul play has occurred and how it should be punished phl
The referee has to go through a four-step process (detailed below) to determine the extent of the foul play and the sanction phl
The four steps are:Has head contact occurred?Was there any foul play?What was the degree of danger?Is there any mitigation? (World Rugby)Step 1 (has head contact occurred?) is relatively straightforward, with head contact including the head and the face as well as the neck and throat area phl
If any head contact is made at all, we move on to Step 2 phl
Step 2 (was there foul play?) is a touch more complex phl
The referees are told to consider whether the head contact was either intentional, reckless or avoidable – e phl
g phl
the defender is always upright phl
If it was, the tackler will be penalised and they move on to Step 3 phl
However, if the head contact was deemed not to be foul play, the game continues phl
Step 3 (what was the degree of danger?) – judged from high to low – determines the initial punishment phl
A degree of high danger is judged on any of: direct contact rather than indirect, a high-force impact, a lack of control from the tackler, the incident occurring at high speed, the tackler leading with the head/shoulder/elbow/forearm or the tackle being reckless phl
If the referee judges there to be a high degree of danger, a red card will be shown phl
Meanwhile, low danger is judged as indirect contact, low force, low speed or no leading head/shoulder/forearm/swinging arm and a yellow card or even just a penalty to the opposition may be awarded phl
The final step, Step 4 (is there any mitigation?) determines whether the punishment can be reduced by one grade (i phl
e red card down to yellow card or yellow card down to just a penalty) phl
Mitigation includes a sudden or significant drop in height or change in direction from ball carrier, a late change in dynamics due to another player in the contact area, a clear effort from the tackler to reduce their height or the tackler having no time to adjust phl
However, mitigation will never apply for intentional or always-illegal acts of foul play phl
The referee crosses their arms to signal a Bunker review (Getty Images)What about the Foul Play Review Officer/Bunker review?Introduced for this World Cup was the Bunker review system phl
This allows the referee to issue a yellow card to a player, sending them to the sin-bin while play goes on, where a Foul Play Review Official (FPRO) will then take another look at the incident and determine if the yellow card should be upgraded to red, allowing the game to continue rather than a long stoppage to debate this phl
This is what happened to Curry against Argentina phl
The referee crosses their arms to indicate a Bunker review will take place phl
Once a player is in the sin-bin, the FPRO has up to eight minutes to review the decision and decide if it warrants upgrading to a red card phl
If not, the player will return to the field after their 10 minutes in the sin-bin has elapsed phl
More aboutRugby World CupSam CaneNew Zealand rugbySouth Africa rugbyWayne BarnesJoin our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesComments1/5Cane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?Cane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?New Zealand's Sam Cane after being show a red cardPACane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?Referee Wayne Barnes shows a red card to New Zealand's Sam CanePACane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?World RugbyCane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?The referee crosses their arms to signal a Bunker review Getty ImagesCane red card: Why was All Blacks star sent off against Springboks?AFP via Getty Images✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today phl
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicsphl BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy phl
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply phl
Hi {{indy phl
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}}@keyframes slidedown-video{0%{transform:translateY(-100%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}}@keyframes slideup-video{0%{transform:translateY(200%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}} phl
